On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:19 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 2:31 AM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote: > > > To determine the organizational domain for a message under >> evaluation, >> > and thus where to look for a policy statement, DMARC makes use of a >> > Public Suffix List. >> > The process for doing this can be found in Section 3.2 of the DMARC >> > specification. >> >> Couldn't we skip that kind of functional intro and say something general, >> such >> as anticipating Section 2.2: >> >> Public Suffix Domains (PSDs) are domain names publicly accessible for >> domain registration. As explained in Section 2.2, they include all >> top >> level domains and some more. The way delegations occur on the global >> Internet makes it difficult to establish whether a domain is a PSD. >> A >> community maintained Public Suffix List (PSL) exists for that >> purpose. >> >> Thinking twice, perhaps we don't need to introduce the PSL until Section >> 3.4. >> In that case, strike the last two sentences of the above paragraph. >> > > It's not obvious to me that this is better, but sure, let's discuss it. > >> Here's the paragraph in question <t>To determine the organizational domain for a message under evaluation, and thus where to look for a policy statement, DMARC makes use of a Public Suffix List. The process for doing this can be found in Section 3.2 of the DMARC specification.</t> The more I look at this, you need it near the top because that is where the discussion of the policy. But also open to be convinced. tim >>
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
