dmarc  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [dmarc-ietf] What happens when the DMARC record contains two identical tags? OLIVIER HUREAU
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] What happens when the DMARC record contains two identical tags? Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] What happens when the DMARC record contains two identical tags? Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] What happens when the DMARC record contains two identical tags? OLIVIER HUREAU
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] What happens when the DMARC record contains two identical tags? Mark Alley
• [dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Jul 23 06:00:04 2023 John Levine
• [dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Jul 16 06:00:03 2023 John Levine
• [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? OLIVIER HUREAU
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? OLIVIER HUREAU
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Jan Dušátko
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? OLIVIER HUREAU
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Mark Alley
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Neil Anuskiewicz
  • [dmarc-ietf] p=interoperability p=compliance p=orgname:policyname Jesse Thompson
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] p=interoperability p=compliance p=orgname:policyname Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] p=interoperability p=compliance p=orgname:policyname John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] p=interoperability p=compliance p=orgname:policyname Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] p=interoperability p=compliance p=orgname:policyname Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] p=interoperability p=compliance p=orgname:policyname Jesse Thompson
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] p=interoperability p=compliance p=orgname:policyname John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] How did DMARC go wrong, and how does our document fix it? Douglas Foster
• [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry) Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry) Wei Chuang
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry) Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry) Jan Dušátko
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry) Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry) Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry) Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry) Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry) Jesse Thompson
• [dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Jul 9 06:00:04 2023 John Levine
• [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Summary: Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Scott Kitterman
• [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-28.txt internet-drafts
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-28.txt Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-28.txt Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-28.txt Neil Anuskiewicz
• [dmarc-ietf] DMARC session agenda for IETF 117 Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC session agenda for IETF 117 Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC session agenda for IETF 117 Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC session agenda for IETF 117 Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC session agenda for IETF 117 Jim Fenton
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC session agenda for IETF 117 Barry Leiba
• [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Brotman, Alex
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Tero Kivinen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Tero Kivinen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Baptiste Carvello
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Baptiste Carvello
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Emanuel Schorsch
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Wei Chuang
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Baptiste Carvello
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Mark Alley
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Jan Dušátko
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list OLIVIER HUREAU
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Baptiste Carvello
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliminating From Munging from this list Tero Kivinen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Baptiste Carvello
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Tero Kivinen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Baptiste Carvello
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Baptiste Carvello
  • [dmarc-ietf] SMTP Result Codes was -Re: Another p=reject text proposal Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] SMTP Result Codes was -Re: Another p=reject text proposal Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] SMTP Result Codes was -Re: Another p=reject text proposal Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] SMTP Result Codes was -Re: Another p=reject text proposal Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] SMTP Result Codes was -Re: Another p=reject text proposal Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] SMTP Result Codes was -Re: Another p=reject text proposal Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] a detour into lists, Another p=reject text proposal John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] a detour into lists, Another p=reject text proposal Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Tero Kivinen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Richard Clayton
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Matthäus Wander
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Wei Chuang
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Tero Kivinen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Jesse Thompson
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal Jesse Thompson
• [dmarc-ietf] Questions regarding RFC 8617 Marcello
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Questions regarding RFC 8617 Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Questions regarding RFC 8617 Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Questions regarding RFC 8617 Marcello
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Questions regarding RFC 8617 Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Questions regarding RFC 8617 John Levine
• [dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Jul 2 06:00:04 2023 John Levine
• [dmarc-ietf] dmarc - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 117 "IETF Secretariat"
• [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD? Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD? Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD? Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD? Seth Blank
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD? Dave Crocker
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD? Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD? Jesse Thompson
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD? Dave Crocker
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD? Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD? Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD? Neil
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD? Dave Crocker
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD? Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD? Tim Wicinski
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD? Dave Crocker
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD? Jesse Thompson
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD? Hector Santos
• [dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Jun 25 06:00:04 2023 John Levine
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] easier DKIM, DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal Hector Santos
• [dmarc-ietf] SPF/DKIM/DMARC statistics from Valimail Todd Herr
• [dmarc-ietf] The auth= tag, was DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] The auth= tag, was DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal Emanuel Schorsch
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] The auth= tag, was DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] The auth= tag, was DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] The auth= tag, was DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal Jan Dušátko
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] The auth= tag, was DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal Alessandro Vesely

• Earlier messages
• Later messages