I did read that before I replied. I just read it again. I don't see where it specifies which fields should be DKIM signed. Did I miss it?
Scott K On October 8, 2021 3:58:16 PM UTC, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: >On 10/8/2021 8:41 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> It's not clear to me which you mean by author's domain? Are you suggesting >> that the email originator include both Author and From and DKIM sign Author >> instead of From? > >Yes he is. Please see: > > Email Author Header Field > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9057/ > >> Abstract >> >> Internet mail defines the From: header field to indicate the author >> of the message's content and the Sender: field to indicate who >> initially handled the message on the author's behalf. The Sender: >> field is optional if it has the same information as the From: field. >> This was not a problem until development of stringent protections on >> use of the From: field. It has prompted Mediators, such as mailing >> lists, to modify the From: field to circumvent mail rejection caused >> by those protections. In effect, the From: field has become >> dominated by its role as a handling identifier. >> >> The current specification augments the altered use of the From: field >> by specifying the Author: field, which ensures identification of the >> original author of the message and is not subject to modification by >> Mediators. This document is published as an Experimental RFC to >> assess community interest, functional efficacy, and technical >> adequacy. > >d/ > _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
