On October 8, 2021 4:13:50 PM UTC, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: >On 10/8/2021 9:04 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> I did read that before I replied. I just read it again. I don't see where >> it specifies which fields should be DKIM signed. Did I miss it? > >No, that is outside its scope. Its scope is defining a field. > >Something like specifying what should be DKIM signed is a very different >task and needs to be done within the scope of a specification that >worries about message 'protections' or the like.
Agreed. I was confused because it appeared to me that you were directing me there for an answer about DKIM signing and I couldn't find it. In shorthand terms, Author is the opposite of Sender. In the existing Sender paradigm From is constant, the mediator would add Sender, which would result in sent by Sender on behalf of From. Under this proposal the originator includes both From and Author, the mediator mangles From and the result could be sent by From on behalf of Author. Is that right? Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
