On 10/8/2021 9:04 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I did read that before I replied. I just read it again. I don't see where it
specifies which fields should be DKIM signed. Did I miss it?
No, that is outside its scope. Its scope is defining a field.
Something like specifying what should be DKIM signed is a very different
task and needs to be done within the scope of a specification that
worries about message 'protections' or the like.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
[email protected]
408.329.0791
Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
Information & Planning Coordinator
American Red Cross
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
