It is curious that only a few days ago, John was arguing that there would be no intermediate policy records, so the first one encountered would have to be the organizational domain. Today, he is worried that all of those intermediate policy records will be mis-labeled.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 12:43 PM John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > It appears that Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> said: > >Setting a role=org flag would be akin to updating the PSL. Not something > that > >every domain does every day. Perhaps nobody will ever do it. ... > > Assuming you expect role=org to mean the same as what Scott and I mean by > psd=n, > I think it would be a cruel joke on our users to give it a name that looks > like > something that has to be in every org domain's record. You and I know > what it > means, but it'd be just a matter of time before someone decided it was > mandatory > because it's "more secure". > > It is a good thing that psd=y and psd=n look obscure because they *are* > obscure > with psd=n being doubly obscure. It is such an extreme corner case that > it's > probably not worth the effort to add it to the spec, with our efforts > better spent > getting the 52 DMARC records at PSLs updated. > > R's, > John > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
