I think it would be a cruel joke on our users to give it a name that looks
like something that has to be in every org domain's record.
You're welcome to suggest better names.
Like I said, psd=y / psd=n
Hm... However small, it's the only quality gain we can expect by switching
to tree walk.
Sorry, that's just wrong. The PSL is only an approximation to the
boundaries for http cookies, and it's a worse approximation to DMARC
boundaries. The tree walk lets domains say what their actual policy is.
Roughly, I think it could grow to the size of the PSL private domains section,
no?
Yes, that might be the number of DMARC records with psd=y, although if
the PSD doesn't do mail and doesn't have a PSD above it, which is the
typical case, it doesn't need a DMARC record at all.
Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
