This is what happens when you aren’t involved in regular RFC discussions. Sorry, my lack of patience got me.
-- Les From: Barry Leiba <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 12:03 PM To: Les Barstow <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Updating ABNF for Next Rev? > > Can we use RFC 7405? It is more readable: > > dmarc-version = "v" *WSP "=" > > *WSP %s"DMARC1" ; case sensitive > > The ABNF definition suggests that > > anything in double-quotes is case insensitive, and that any case-sensitive > > Can we use RFC 7405? It is more readable: > > dmarc-version = "v" *WSP "=" *WSP %s"DMARC1" ; case sensitive > > The ABNF definition suggests that anything in double-quotes is case > insensitive, and that any case-sensitive > values should be escaped as per the -07 definition. Adding a comment that > says “case sensitive” is confusing Did you read RFC 7405? It defines "%s" and makes this quite definitive. Barry
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
