On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 1:40 PM Les Barstow <[email protected]> wrote:
> As Barry pointed out, RFC7405 does provide the %s notation. But since your > voice was added on top of mine, I might point out that 7405 is only > proposed, not accepted. > No, it's an RFC that had IETF consensus to publish, and it shows as updating RFC 5234, so it's effective. That said, somehow I wasn't aware of this, so it looks like what Alessandro proposed would work and I withdraw my suggestion. Please remember, though, to include RFC 7405 as a new normative reference. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
