It appears that Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> said: >> There is also an HTML version available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-04.html
>This version requires some revision/ discussion by the WG. >In particular, IANA considerations has two subsections which may neew the >chairs approval. I see no need to invent new IANA registries and oppose the proposed registries. It redefines the SPF-DNS report item defined in RFC 6591 in a way that is neither forward nor backward compatible. I oppose this change. >The concept of debug messages might be dropped or expanded. I see no basis for this change either, R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
