It appears that Seth Blank <[email protected]> said: >So how do we handle this? What’s the worst case? Looking at the above >example, the longest “complex org” would be 5 labels long. I think we’ve >already agreed, backed by data from the PSL, that the longest PSD would be >4 labels long. ...
>To be clear, due to the current policy discovery mechanics (check author >domain then jump to organizational domain), I'm not aware of any of these >complex orgs setting dmarc policies on Author Domains at such a depth. i.e. >N=5 today would not break anything currently in place. However, the tree >walk now enables these complex orgs to set policy much deeper in their >hierarchy, which would then potentially not work as expected and possibly >send reports to the wrong destination due to the current N=5. I wouldn't object to 7 but I would like to see a stronger justification than "nobody needs it now but someone might want it later." R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
