Thanks,

I think this is an improvement over the last version.

Scott K

On Monday, April 24, 2023 7:41:45 PM EDT Brotman, Alex wrote:
> I removed the small section that faced objections.
> 
> I updated the ridtxt definition and discovered that mmark was making a mess
> of those asterisks.  When there are more than one/some on a single line, it
> believes you would like some subset to be defined as "<em>" things.
> 
> --
> Alex Brotman
> Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
> Comcast
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dmarc <[email protected]> On Behalf Of [email protected]
> > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2023 7:39 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action:
> > draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-09.txt
> > 
> > 
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> > directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Domain-based
> > Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (DMARC) WG of the IETF.
> > 
> >    Title           : DMARC Aggregate Reporting
> >    Author          : Alex Brotman
> >    Filename        : draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-09.txt
> >    Pages           : 28
> >    Date            : 2023-04-24
> > 
> > Abstract:
> >    DMARC allows for domain holders to request aggregate reports from
> >    receivers.  This report is an XML document, and contains extensible
> >    elements that allow for other types of data to be specified later.
> >    The aggregate reports can be submitted to the domain holder's
> >    specified destination as supported by the receiver.
> >    
> >    This document (along with others) obsoletes RFC7489.
> > 
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dm
> > arc- aggregate-
> > reporting/__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!HBzOZHijNkg7AyDQnUKsIyEGZaJcT2dIFMGNVyqsr7
> > nLWuCbVwCDo_mqKdBpLG2eSmAWmSaOYcZxRLwpzMl1GqF46TKSvg$
> > 
> > There is also an HTML version available at:
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dma
> > rc- aggregate-reporting-
> > 09.html__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!HBzOZHijNkg7AyDQnUKsIyEGZaJcT2dIFMGNVyqsr7nL
> > WuCbVwCDo_mqKdBpLG2eSmAWmSaOYcZxRLwpzMl1GqEqNRr1SA$
> > 
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draf
> > t- ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-
> > 09__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!HBzOZHijNkg7AyDQnUKsIyEGZaJcT2dIFMGNVyqsr7nLWuC
> > bVwCDo_mqKdBpLG2eSmAWmSaOYcZxRLwpzMl1GqFdWqTU2g$
> > 
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at
> > rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > dmarc mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc__;
> > !
> > !CQl3mcHX2A!HBzOZHijNkg7AyDQnUKsIyEGZaJcT2dIFMGNVyqsr7nLWuCbVwCD
> > o_mqKdBpLG2eSmAWmSaOYcZxRLwpzMl1GqEDBiM7_A$
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc




_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to