> As explained in 6.1, that's not actually true if the domains are small enuogh.
> In some of my tiny domains I can often recognize individual messages I've
> sent.  I'd just delete these sentences.

I'd argue that you're in a (mostly) unique situation where you're the sender 
and the report reviewer.  That being said, would you prefer I remove all of 
6.3?  Does the remaining sentence have enough value to keep? Or sweep it up to 
6.1?

--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John R. Levine <jo...@iecc.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2023 10:18 PM
> To: Brotman, Alex <alex_brot...@comcast.com>; dmarc@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-
> reporting-09.txt
> 
> > I removed the small section that faced objections.
> >
> > I updated the ridtxt definition and discovered that mmark was making a
> mess of those asterisks.  When there are more than one/some on a single
> line, it believes you would like some subset to be defined as "<em>" things.
> 
> Looks pretty good.  Minor points:
> 
> The first paragraph in 2.6 says:
> 
>      Where the URI specified in a "rua" tag does not specify otherwise, a
>      Mail Receiver generating a feedback report SHOULD employ a secure
>      transport mechanism.
> 
> Since the only mechanism is mail and nobody's going to S/MIME encrypt their
> reports, I suggest just deleting it.
> 
> 6.3:
> 
>      Mail Receivers should have no concerns in sending reports as they do
>      not contain personal information.  ...
> 
>      Domain Owners should have no concerns in receiving reports as they do
>      not contain personal information.
> 
> As explained in 6.1, that's not actually true if the domains are small enuogh.
> In some of my tiny domains I can often recognize individual messages I've
> sent.  I'd just delete these sentences.
> 
> R's,
> John
> 
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: dmarc <dmarc-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of
> >> internet-dra...@ietf.org
> >> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2023 7:39 PM
> >> To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
> >> Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
> >> Subject: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action:
> >> draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-09.txt
> >>
> >>
> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> >> This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message
> >> Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (DMARC) WG of the IETF.
> >>
> >>    Title           : DMARC Aggregate Reporting
> >>    Author          : Alex Brotman
> >>    Filename        : draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-09.txt
> >>    Pages           : 28
> >>    Date            : 2023-04-24
> >>
> >> Abstract:
> >>    DMARC allows for domain holders to request aggregate reports from
> >>    receivers.  This report is an XML document, and contains extensible
> >>    elements that allow for other types of data to be specified later.
> >>    The aggregate reports can be submitted to the domain holder's
> >>    specified destination as supported by the receiver.
> >>
> >>    This document (along with others) obsoletes RFC7489.
> >>
> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ie
> >> tf-dmarc-
> >> aggregate-
> >>
> reporting/__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!HBzOZHijNkg7AyDQnUKsIyEGZaJcT2dIFMGNVy
> qsr7
> >> nLWuCbVwCDo_mqKdBpLG2eSmAWmSaOYcZxRLwpzMl1GqF46TKSvg$
> >>
> >> There is also an HTML version available at:
> >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-iet
> >> f-dmarc-
> >> aggregate-reporting-
> >>
> 09.html__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!HBzOZHijNkg7AyDQnUKsIyEGZaJcT2dIFMGNVyqsr
> 7nL
> >> WuCbVwCDo_mqKdBpLG2eSmAWmSaOYcZxRLwpzMl1GqEqNRr1SA$
> >>
> >> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2
> >> =draft-
> >> ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-
> >>
> 09__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!HBzOZHijNkg7AyDQnUKsIyEGZaJcT2dIFMGNVyqsr7nLW
> uC
> >> bVwCDo_mqKdBpLG2eSmAWmSaOYcZxRLwpzMl1GqFdWqTU2g$
> >>
> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at
> >> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> dmarc mailing list
> >> dmarc@ietf.org
> >>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
> __;!
> >>
> !CQl3mcHX2A!HBzOZHijNkg7AyDQnUKsIyEGZaJcT2dIFMGNVyqsr7nLWuCbV
> wCD
> >> o_mqKdBpLG2eSmAWmSaOYcZxRLwpzMl1GqEDBiM7_A$
> >
> >
> 
> Regards,
> John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
> Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. <a
> href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://jl.ly__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!Fpku2qYC
> TuZKAA4K08a9mXXHN3ECaWvI28GCiy40HeEi8kyMh5bKjQWeT7UFbqsfeN5N
> v88e0Nj1WqU$">https://jl.ly</a>

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to