> On Jul 19, 2023, at 3:21 PM, Douglas Foster > <dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Perhaps you can clarify what you think DMARC is. > > Apparently a significant number of evaluators think that "DMARC Fail with > p=reject always means unwanted mail". Or to use Michael Hammer's language, > "DMARC Fail with p=reject means the domain owner wants it rejected so I will > reject it." These are exactly the attitudes that cause us so much trouble > because (a) DMARC Fail with p=reject does not mean that rejection is always > the correct response, and (b) DMARC Fail with p=none is an important piece of > information.
Doug, if what you’re saying is true then the root cause might be our fault. If we’ve not communicated clearly enough DMARC’s purpose. A communication problem likely needs to be solved with more and better communication via the standards doc itself and other channels. N _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
