In addition to what Todd offered: On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:51 AM Damien Alexandre <Damien.Alexandre= [email protected]> wrote:
> The RFC first states: > > "Messages bearing a single RFC5322.From field containing multiple > addresses (and, thus, multiple domain names to be evaluated) are > typically rejected because the sorts of mail normally protected by > DMARC do not use this format;” > > And a few lines below: > > "The case of a syntactically valid multi-valued RFC5322.From field > presents a particular challenge. The process in this case is to > apply the DMARC check using each of those domains found in the > RFC5322.From field as the Author Domain and apply the most strict > policy selected among the checks that fail.” > > I find the two propositions quite contradictory and not sure which one > should be applied. > What I recall from when we wrote that was that the first paragraph really means "Most MTAs reject this anyway so it shouldn't even get to your DMARC filter" and the second means "If it does get to you, here's how you should probably react." -MSK, participating
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
