Okay.  I think 8.6 is the one in error.  You see how this is going to go, right?

Scott K

On February 29, 2024 7:45:15 PM UTC, Todd Herr 
<[email protected]> wrote:
>It is not my intent here to relitigate any issues.
>
>Rather, I believe that the text in 7.6 is wrong, likely due to an oversight
>on my part when the new text in 8.6 was published, and I just want to
>confirm that 7.6 is indeed wrong.
>
>On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 2:10 PM Scott Kitterman <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> In what way is this a new issue that has not already been argued to death
>> in the WG?  I think for WGLC, we've already done this. We will, no doubt
>> get to have this conversation during the IETF last call, but for the
>> working group, this strikes me as exactly the type of relitigation of
>> issues we've been counseled to avoid.
>>
>> Scott K
>>
>> On February 29, 2024 6:54:57 PM UTC, Todd Herr <todd.herr=
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >Colleagues,
>> >
>> >I've been reading DMARCbic rev -30 today with a plan to collect the first
>> >set of minor edits and I came across a sentence that I believe goes beyond
>> >minor, so wanted to get a sanity check.
>> >
>> >Section 7.6, Domain Owner Actions, ends with the following sentence:
>> >
>> >In particular, this document makes explicit that domains for
>> >general-purpose email MUST NOT deploy a DMARC policy of p=reject.
>> >
>> >
>> >I don't believe this to be true, however. Rather, Section 8.6,
>> >Interoperability Considerations, says SHOULD NOT on the topic (e.g., "It
>> is
>> >therefore critical that domains that host users who might post messages to
>> >mailing lists SHOULD NOT publish p=reject")
>> >
>> >Section 7.6 therefore should be updated to read "domains for
>> >general-purpose email SHOULD NOT deploy a DMARC policy of p=reject", yes?
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmarc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>>
>
>

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to