I agree. This is not a substantive issue, but is simply correcting an oversight. SHOULD NOT was the consensus call, and the correction Todd proposes is just making that sentence consistent with that.
Enough said on this; Todd, please just add this change to your other editorial changes. Barry, as chair On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 7:13 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 2:14 PM Seth Blank > <seth=40valimail....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >> >> As Chair: Consensus was already called. Todd just wants the wording >> consistent in the document. There's no need for another decision here. > > > This is my understanding as well. Mike Hammer summarized it neatly. > > -MSK > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
