It appears that Todd Herr <[email protected]> said: >Below please find the current text (rev -30) and my proposed replacement >text.
It seems OK but I would say that at this point that mailto: URI are the only ones currently defined. >PROPOSED REPLACEMENT TEXT: >========================= cut here ========================== >rua: > >Addresses to which aggregate feedback reports are to be sent >(comma-separated plain-text list of DMARC URIs; OPTIONAL). If present, the >Domain Owner is requesting Mail Receivers to send aggregate feedback >reports about results of authentication checks performed on mail using the >domain for which the DMARC policy record is published. [ >I-D.ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting ><#I-D.ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting>] discusses >considerations that apply when the domain name of a URI differs from that >of the domain advertising the policy. See Section 11.6 ><#external-report-addresses> for additional considerations. Any valid URI >can be specified. A Mail Receiver MUST implement support for a "mailto:"; >URI, i.e., the ability to send a DMARC report via electronic mail. If the >tag is not provided, Mail Receivers MUST NOT generate aggregate feedback >reports for the domain. URIs not supported by Mail Receivers MUST be >ignored. The aggregate feedback report format is described in [ >I-D.ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting <#I-D.ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting>]. ><#section-5.3-4.14.1> >ruf: > >Addresses to which message-specific failure information is to be reported >(comma-separated plain-text list of DMARC URIs; OPTIONAL). If present, the >Domain Owner is requesting Mail Receivers to send detailed failure reports >about messages that fail the DMARC evaluation in specific ways (see the >"fo" tag above). [I-D.ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting ><#I-D.ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting>] discusses considerations that apply >when the domain name of a URI differs from that of the domain advertising >the policy. See Section 11.6 <#external-report-addresses> for additional >considerations. A Mail Receiver MUST implement support for a "mailto:"; URI, >i.e., the ability to send a DMARC report via electronic mail. If the tag is >not provided, Mail Receivers MUST NOT generate failure reports for the >domain. URIs not supported by Mail Receivers MUST be ignored. The format >for message-specific failure reporting is described in [ >I-D.ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting <#I-D.ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting>]. >========================= cut here ========================== > >Discuss at your convenience, please... > _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
