On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 5:20 PM Seth Blank <seth= [email protected]> wrote:
> mailto: is the only function that's ever been used. We even discussed > exploring other mechanisms, and consensus was to drop that exploration. I > can't find the ticket quickly, but I know it was covered early on during > the bis work. > > Do we just want to dramatically simplify this, and throw the "mailto:"; > into the reporting ABNF and call it a day? It would dramatically streamline > the text. > Normatively, I don't think it makes a difference. If you say this has to be a URI but "mailto" is the only supported one, you've done the logical equivalent of constraining the ABNF. Then, if later one someone does succeed in arguing that some other URI scheme is usable here, such an update would be a little simpler if it didn't require an ABNF update. Given that, I'd argue for not changing the ABNF. -MSK, p11g
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
