On Fri 30/Aug/2024 01:50:55 +0200 Daniel K. wrote:
On 7/30/24 22:31, John R. Levine wrote:
Thanks for your note. I think we've addressed everything in the main
7489bis but some of the stuff in the reporting docs looks like it still
needs to be fixed.
If you're willing to futz with the markdown, pull requests with proposed
changes would be great.
Thank you for your encouragement. I've made my first pull request
starting with the aggregate reporting draft.
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting/pull/18
I agree on most changes, possibly except that 05.06.07.08 seems to me an
acceptable IPv4 expression, and perhaps the obsolescence note is required (?)
Thanks
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
