On Fri 30/Aug/2024 12:58:55 +0200 Daniel K. wrote:
On 8/30/24 10:12, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
I agree on most changes, possibly except that 05.06.07.08 seems to me an
acceptable IPv4 expression,
Yeah, but if we allow leading zeroes, 005.006.007.008 should also be
allowed, but the current regex does not allow it.
We should at least go one way or the other.
If double leading zeroes should be allowed, then substitute "1?\d?\d"
with "[01]?\d?\d" instead.
That looks better.
and perhaps the obsolescence note is required (?)
There is a similar note in the abstract of the dmarcbis draft, but not
in the failure-reporting draft.
Should I add one? The I-D expires next September...
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
