Adding... > 2. The IETF will have specified what it collectively thinks is > necessary for appropriate interoperability, which is what we strive to > do.
Because, in case I haven't made my thoughts on this clear before, we (the IETF in general, not just this working group in this case) should not avoid saying MUST where MUST is needed just because we think (know) that some implementors will ignore it. Barry _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
