On 23 Oct 2024, at 16:35, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > DMARCbis appears to address this via the text of Section 7.4, which in > essence tells senders to be careful about using "p=reject" if their users > might use lists,
Section 7.4 also says that p=reject can be incompatible with “alumni forwarders” and role-based email addresses, neither of which are under the control of the sender’s users. For example, my alumni address forwarder breaks DKIM signatures in messages it sends me. That means that it’s never safe for a domain to publish p=reject except possibly among a closed community of domains. -Jim _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
