I looked. This is fine according to the registration rules. It's a good schema for the most part; my ARTART review has a few gripes, but that has no bearing on its eligibility for registration.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024, at 10:34, David Dong via RT wrote: > Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: dmarc WG), > > As the designated experts for the IETF XML Registry registry, can you > review the proposed registration in > draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-23 for us? Please see > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting/ > > The due date is December 10th. > > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, > we'll make the registration at: > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/ > > Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewer, we’ll act on the > first response we receive. > > With thanks, > > David Dong > IANA Services Sr. Specialist _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
