Hi Martin, Tim (cc: dmarc), Can you confirm that version -28 is still OK? Several subsections related to XML elements were added to Section 2 after your review of -23.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting thanks, Amanda On Wed Nov 27 01:42:52 2024, [email protected] wrote: > I looked. This is fine according to the registration rules. > > It's a good schema for the most part; my ARTART review has a few > gripes, but that has no bearing on its eligibility for registration. > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024, at 10:34, David Dong via RT wrote: > > Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: dmarc WG), > > > > As the designated experts for the IETF XML Registry registry, can you > > review the proposed registration in > > draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-23 for us? Please see > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate- > > reporting/ > > > > The due date is December 10th. > > > > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, > > we'll make the registration at: > > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/ > > > > Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewer, we’ll act on the > > first response we receive. > > > > With thanks, > > > > David Dong > > IANA Services Sr. Specialist _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
