On Fri, Jan 2, 2026 at 2:03 PM Barry Leiba <[email protected]> wrote:
> > One small note: while it is obvious what is meant with "defang URIs by > substituting hxxp for http;” > > I think it should be "defang URIs by substituting > http for hxxp;". > > No, that would make it exactly backward: you substitute the new for the > old. > I personally feel it differs based on "for" versus "with"? Eg to make pear pie, "substitute apples with pears" or "substitute pears for apples" (for apples, substitute with pears)? Anyway, happy to let the RFC Editor handle that, this is above my pay grade :) (Actually, I thing it would be better to avoid “defang” anyway, and say > something like “make URIs unclickable by…”.) > True. Paul
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
