On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Leandro Lucarella <[email protected]> wrote: > And again, the age of a bug is only relevant when users actually *hit* > the bug.
Someone did hit the bug, and they entered it 5 years ago. Sure you want to give current users higher priority, just as you give paying customers better support. I think it is very good to have a process where every bug is on a path to resolution. Or another point, it is good to review the bugs, like finding those that have already been fixed, so they are not "forgotten." Looking at the last several release, 70-100 dmd bugs being fixed, 5 seems like a reasonable number to not take away from regressions and other work. _______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
