I hear you.. but this is what the original charter already said. We deliberately scope the charter in a way that we could avoid tunnelling between the end host and the access router.
- Jouni On Mar 26, 2014, at 4:32 PM, "Templin, Fred L" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jouni, > > In paragraph 5, it says: > > "At least IPv6 is assumed to be present in both the mobile host/router > and the access networks." > > I disagree with the trailing phrase "and the access networks" > since many access networks may remain as IPv4-only for a long > time yet. It would satisfy my concern if the sentence were > modified to simply drop the trailing phrase. > > Thanks - Fred > [email protected] > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen >> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:03 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [DMM] rechartering draft text updated >> >> Folks, >> >> Take a look at the latest revision. I have added the initial stab >> for the milestones. Comments and flames are welcome. If you want >> something to be changed, just propose text & diff. You might also >> want to say why the change is needed. >> >> https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter/blob/master/recharter_draft.txt >> >> - Jouni >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmm mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
