On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:47 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:

> 
> On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:08 PM, Alper Yegin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Jouni,
>> 
>>      DMM can be used to realise such a distributed deployment
>>      model, by distributing forwarding functions at optimal location; for
>>      example, closer either to the mobile user or the corresponding node.
>> 
>> 
>> s/user/node
> 
> Ack.
> 
>> 
>> 
>>      Although the maintenance of stable home address(es) and/or prefix(es)
>>      and upper level sessions is a desirable goal when mobile hosts/routers
>>      change their point of attachment to the Internet, it is not a strict
>>      requirement. Mobile hosts/routers should not assume that IP
>>      addressing including home address(es) and/or home network prefix(es)
>>      remain the same throughout the entire upper level session lifetime,
>>      or that support for mobility functions is provided on the network side
>>      in all conditions, unless these properties are specifically indicated
>>      to the mobile node and its applications from the network.
>> 
>> Is this trying to say "the network may not be able to provide a stable IP 
>> address to the MN"?
>> Even in the presence of a DMM solution?
> 
> Yes.. it is imho a valid use case that the mn just does not care all 
> addresses having mobility. The DMM solution may provide stable address only 
> for a subset of addresses available for the mn.
> 
>> 
>>  Mar 2014 - Submit 'The deployment models and scenarios' submitted to the 
>> IESG.
>>                    To be Informational RFC.
>>  Marc 2014 - Submit 'Enhanced gateway and mobility anchor selection' 
>> submitted to the
>>                    IESG. To be Proposed Standard.
>> 
>> I guess these are meant to be 2015.
> 
> Uhh.. yes. (copy-paste is always dangerous)
> 
>> 
>> Btw, the milestones do not seem to have an item to cover for "Forwarding 
>> path and signalling management"
> 
> Not at this point. Two reasons: I could not figure a good name for the 
> milestone and also was a bit concerned whether we would have all the energy 
> to work on this many documents in parallel.
> 

Jouni, that is the essential deliverable of the DMM WG, IMO.

Alper






> - Jouni
> 
> 
>> 
>> Thanks Jouni
>> 
>> Alper
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 26, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>> 
>>> Folks,
>>> 
>>> Take a look at the latest revision. I have added the initial stab
>>> for the milestones. Comments and flames are welcome. If you want
>>> something to be changed, just propose text & diff. You might also
>>> want to say why the change is needed.
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter/blob/master/recharter_draft.txt
>>> 
>>> - Jouni
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmm mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to