On Mar 26, 2014, at 8:11 PM, Alper Yegin wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:47 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:08 PM, Alper Yegin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jouni,
>>>
>>> DMM can be used to realise such a distributed deployment
>>> model, by distributing forwarding functions at optimal location; for
>>> example, closer either to the mobile user or the corresponding node.
>>>
>>>
>>> s/user/node
>>
>> Ack.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Although the maintenance of stable home address(es) and/or prefix(es)
>>> and upper level sessions is a desirable goal when mobile hosts/routers
>>> change their point of attachment to the Internet, it is not a strict
>>> requirement. Mobile hosts/routers should not assume that IP
>>> addressing including home address(es) and/or home network prefix(es)
>>> remain the same throughout the entire upper level session lifetime,
>>> or that support for mobility functions is provided on the network side
>>> in all conditions, unless these properties are specifically indicated
>>> to the mobile node and its applications from the network.
>>>
>>> Is this trying to say "the network may not be able to provide a stable IP
>>> address to the MN"?
>>> Even in the presence of a DMM solution?
>>
>> Yes.. it is imho a valid use case that the mn just does not care all
>> addresses having mobility. The DMM solution may provide stable address only
>> for a subset of addresses available for the mn.
>>
>>>
>>> Mar 2014 - Submit 'The deployment models and scenarios' submitted to the
>>> IESG.
>>> To be Informational RFC.
>>> Marc 2014 - Submit 'Enhanced gateway and mobility anchor selection'
>>> submitted to the
>>> IESG. To be Proposed Standard.
>>>
>>> I guess these are meant to be 2015.
>>
>> Uhh.. yes. (copy-paste is always dangerous)
>>
>>>
>>> Btw, the milestones do not seem to have an item to cover for "Forwarding
>>> path and signalling management"
>>
>> Not at this point. Two reasons: I could not figure a good name for the
>> milestone and also was a bit concerned whether we would have all the energy
>> to work on this many documents in parallel.
>>
>
> Jouni, that is the essential deliverable of the DMM WG, IMO.
And how you would like to see that milestone to be formulated here?
Give some text us to jump into..
Cheers,
2001:db8::4a:6f75:6e69
>
> Alper
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> - Jouni
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Jouni
>>>
>>> Alper
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 26, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> Take a look at the latest revision. I have added the initial stab
>>>> for the milestones. Comments and flames are welcome. If you want
>>>> something to be changed, just propose text & diff. You might also
>>>> want to say why the change is needed.
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter/blob/master/recharter_draft.txt
>>>>
>>>> - Jouni
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dmm mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
