On 3/27/14 2:26 PM, "Jouni Korhonen" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >You know that it just happens to be the only RFC even attempting to >explain >how LMAs are selected dynamically. If the reference here is contentious, >I am >happy to remore it.. just give me alternative text. I agree. RFC6097 and RFC6463 are relevant to the above work item. It is possible the WG may (most likely) adopt newer approaches for gateway selection, but a reference to the prior work is very much relevant. It is a very relevant reference. We do want to leverage work where possible. I'm fine with this. Regards Sri _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
