Hi Alex >-----Message d'origine----- >De : dmm [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Alexandru Petrescu >Envoyé : vendredi 28 mars 2014 12:11 >À : [email protected] >Objet : Re: [DMM] rechartering draft comments > >Le 27/03/2014 22:40, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) a écrit : >> >> >> On 3/27/14 2:26 PM, "Jouni Korhonen" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> You know that it just happens to be the only RFC even attempting to >>> explain how LMAs are selected dynamically. If the reference here is >>> contentious, I am happy to remore it.. just give me alternative text. >> >> >> I agree. RFC6097 and RFC6463 are relevant to the above work item. > >I am not sure where these two RFCs appeared from, I dont remember seeing >any discussion about them. Clarification please? > >I suppose work on anchor selection would need a form of problem statement >- is there a problem statement in the current drafts? >
You can find information in the gap analysis draft; in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-aliahmad-dmm-anchor-selection as well Pierrick >> It is possible the WG may (most likely) adopt newer approaches for >> gateway selection, but a reference to the prior work is very much >> relevant. It is a very relevant reference. We do want to leverage work >> where possible. I'm fine with this. > >I agree with these affirmations. > >Alex > >> >> >> >> Regards Sri >> >> >> _______________________________________________ dmm mailing >list >> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >> >> > > >_______________________________________________ >dmm mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
