You are talking about Gateway Initiated DS-Lite (RFC 6674). That is a solution based on DS-Lite, i.e. a variation of DS-Lite or RFC 6333.
Again, my plea to you, please come up with your draft and let WG see what you propose. That is the right way to go. Behcet On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <[email protected]> wrote: > Alternatively, you capture the deployment models and then identify the > solution gaps or solutions that meet the goals ... > >> Sorry, I am familiar with those areas, they are not in Intarea :-). > > > RFC-6674; A solution driven by a deployment requirement. > > > Sri > > > On 7/22/14 9:36 AM, "Behcet Sarikaya" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Hi Sri, >> >> >>On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) >><[email protected]> wrote: >>> Behcet, >>> >>> Check some of the documents in MPLS/Routing areas. >> >>Sorry, I am familiar with those areas, they are not in Intarea :-). >> >>> >>> DMM to most part is about deployment. Without bringing the deployment >>> aspects, documenting DMM solutions will be immature. >> >>I am looking at this Softwire document: >> >>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-map-deployment-04 >> >>This document is looking into models on how MAP can be deployed on >>large-scale carrier networks. >> >>But the catch is that MAP which is the solution protocol is already >>defined in a different document by Softwire. >> >>So the deployment models IF NEEDED follows the solution selection process. >> >>May I suggest you to please come up with a draft including your ideas >>on the architecture and solution and have it discussed like any other >>protocol proposals? You may wish to add any deployment concerns there >>in your draft if you like. >> >>Also any architecture work will have implications on the solution and >>if they are done at the WG level that practically means that a lot of >>bias on the solutions which are already proposed will be imposed. I >>don't think that is what the WG wants to do. >> >>Regards, >> >>Behcet >> >> > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
