So, what is your point ? Can we elevate the discussion to some decent levels and focus on technicals ?
What we are discussing is an architectural approach that addresses DMM Requirements; This is what we discussed with number of people and have agreements. Now we are discussing with a larger group. Like any other other proposal, this does not have a WG status and is only a proposal. Nothing in the process requires I-D for discussion. I've done many such presentations prior to publishing -00 version. Sri On 7/23/14 6:40 AM, "Behcet Sarikaya" <[email protected]> wrote: >I am not against any work which is based on an existing draft. I spoke >against having a long presentation and there is no draft. > >Another point here is, yesterday I discussed with Marco on this. Any >architecture and so called deployment proposal has a sense of solution >in it. I don't buy the argument that the architecture is generic and >that the deployment is generic. >At this point in time there is no such thing. Such proposals represent >the authors solution approach.They are reading other solution >proposals and they don't like some aspects in those solution drafts >and they want to present some alternative approaches. > >So, as I said before, Marco, Sri, Pierrick, if there are any others, >are free to write drafts making it clear that in the draft they are >talking about their own solution. There is nothing wrong with it. > >I hope this makes my point clear. > >Regards, > >Behcet > >On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:36 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks Pierrick for the pointer! >> And FWIW also Marcos draft-liebsch-dmm-framework-03 addresses >>deployment and architecture aspects for evaluating various approaches >> BR >> Dirk >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >>[email protected] >> Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2014 10:13 >> To: [email protected]; Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [DMM] IETF#90 DMM agenda update >> >> >> >>>-----Message d'origine----- >>>De : dmm [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Behcet Sarikaya >>>Envoyé : mardi 22 juillet 2014 19:04 À : Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Cc : >>>[email protected] Objet : Re: [DMM] IETF#90 DMM agenda update >>> >>>On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) >>><[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I think you are mixing the topics here. >>> >>>I am not sure who? >>>How can you talk about deployment without having a solution? >>>Deployment where? >>> >>>> >>>> Any case, I don't have plans to write one .. >>> >>>I know that and that's why I kept asking, just in case you might change >>>your mind. >>> >>>Maybe you can write a draft evaluating existing proposals from your >>>"architecture" and your "deployment" point of view. >>> >> >> Worth to be considered IMHO: draft-liu-dmm-deployment-scenario >> >>>Behcet >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sri >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7/22/14 9:56 AM, "Behcet Sarikaya" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>>You are talking about Gateway Initiated DS-Lite (RFC 6674). >>>>> >>>>>That is a solution based on DS-Lite, i.e. a variation of DS-Lite or >>>>>RFC 6333. >>>>> >>>>>Again, my plea to you, please come up with your draft and let WG see >>>>>what you propose. >>>>> >>>>>That is the right way to go. >>>>> >>>>>Behcet >>>> >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>dmm mailing list >>>[email protected] >>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >> >> >>_________________________________________________________________________ >>________________________________________________ >> >> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations >>confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, >>exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par >>erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les >>pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles >>d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete >>altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. >> >> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged >>information that may be protected by law; they should not be >>distributed, used or copied without authorisation. >> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and >>delete this message and its attachments. >> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have >>been modified, changed or falsified. >> Thank you. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmm mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
