Sri, On 9/9/14 2:09 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote: > Hi Suresh, > > Thanks. That makes sense. Now, I remember that spec/update. > > The option name conflict and my search not finding 4283 references threw > me off. Thanks. >
If this is *really* confusing, it may be worth updating the name of one of them. Not sure if it is or not... Brian > >> No comments on that one :-) > > > :) > > > Regards > Sri > > > > > On 9/9/14 10:39 AM, "Suresh Krishnan" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Sri, >> >> On 09/09/2014 10:11 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote: >>> This is bit strange. Some thing changed in the IANA Mobile Node >>> Identifier pages. I assumed the MN Id was defined in RFC4283. How come >>> I see a definition in 5271 as well. >>> >>> >>> Confused. Jouni / Brian Any ideas ? Unless, I've been smoking Š >> >> No comments on that one :-). There are indeed two definitions of the >> MNID types. >> >> The one you originally saw is for the mobility option and is available >> in the mobility parameters registry >> >> http://www.iana.org/assignments/mobility-parameters/mobility-parameters.xh >> tml#mobility-parameters-5 >> >> The second one you saw is for the *ND option* to carry MNID from the >> ICMPv6 parameters registry >> >> http://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters/icmpv6-parameters.xhtml# >> icmpv6-parameters-5 >> >> Thanks >> Suresh >> > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
