Hi Suresh, Thanks. That makes sense. Now, I remember that spec/update.
The option name conflict and my search not finding 4283 references threw me off. Thanks. > No comments on that one :-) :) Regards Sri On 9/9/14 10:39 AM, "Suresh Krishnan" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Sri, > >On 09/09/2014 10:11 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote: >> This is bit strange. Some thing changed in the IANA Mobile Node >> Identifier pages. I assumed the MN Id was defined in RFC4283. How come >> I see a definition in 5271 as well. >> >> >> Confused. Jouni / Brian Any ideas ? Unless, I've been smoking Š > >No comments on that one :-). There are indeed two definitions of the >MNID types. > >The one you originally saw is for the mobility option and is available >in the mobility parameters registry > >http://www.iana.org/assignments/mobility-parameters/mobility-parameters.xh >tml#mobility-parameters-5 > >The second one you saw is for the *ND option* to carry MNID from the >ICMPv6 parameters registry > >http://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters/icmpv6-parameters.xhtml# >icmpv6-parameters-5 > >Thanks >Suresh > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
