Hi Charlie,
This is good. Thanks.
1.) If EUI-48 and EUI-64 addresses are derived of a 48-bit IEEE 802.2
address, why do we need to two sub-types ? Why not have just one sub-type
for mac based identifiers ?
2.) Sub type value (1) is currently used. Its currently overloaded for
IMSI-NAI (3GPP specs) and generic NAI based identifiers. Given the
definition of new sub-types, we need some text explaining the motivation
3.) Proposed Sub-type value of (2) for IPv6 address. What exactly is this
? Are these CGA-based IPv6 addresses ?
New Mobile Node Identifier Types
+-----------------+------------------------+
| Identifier Type | Identifier Type Number |
+-----------------+------------------------+
| IPv6 Address | 2 |
| | |
| IMSI | 3 |
| | |
| P-TMSI | 4 |
| | |
| EUI-48 address | 5 |
| | |
| EUI-64 address | 6 |
| | |
| GUTI | 7 |
+-----------------+------------------------+
Regards
Sri
PS: Good to see Vijay back
On 9/9/14 1:28 PM, "Charlie Perkins" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Hello folks,
>
>Here's the last Internet Draft that we did, long ago expired:
>http://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-perkins-mext-4283mnids-01.txt
>
>I'll resubmit it with a few updates as a personal draft to dmm.
>
>Regards,
>Charlie P.
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
