Please see inline for my opinion about your questions to slide 6-8.
>-----Original Message----- >From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli >(sgundave) >Sent: Donnerstag, 16. Oktober 2014 10:58 >To: Alper Yegin; [email protected] >Subject: Re: [DMM] Forwarding Path & Signaling Management discussion .. > > >> >>- Slide 8: Is this simply showing how BGP-based solutions can be >>covered here? Or something else? > > >[Sri] The interface can be realized using multiple approaches, one being the >BGP-based approach, other explicit signaling based interface > > >> >>- What is the relationship between Slides 6-7-8? > > >[Sri] I though we had some discussion on this in the last IETF. In the context >of >Forwarding path, the key point is the interface between a control plane entity >and a data plane entity. >May be Marco has a better explanation > [marco] slides 6 and 7 show the enforcement of policies on data plane anchor and data plane node, whereas slide 8 shows that policies can also be enforced at regular transport network functions to steer forwarding of (downlink) traffic to the MN's anchor. This can lead to the following discussion point: If we keep mobility- or session states away from the data plane functions, but hold them solely in the control functions, the question is whether we need to differentiate data plane anchor and data plane node from these transport network routers or switches. marco > > >> _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
