thanks for your explaination, wouldn't that be RFC 4283bis? -Hui
2014-10-18 12:55 GMT+08:00 Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <[email protected]>: > Hi Hui, > > May be this is for Charlie and also Vijay from the ancient history. But, > let me try. > > The work in MIF is more about defining network/PVD identity. In one > sense its similar to the PLMN ID construct. Where as the MN-Id extensions > draft is more about generating MN-Identity based on other protocol > identifiers and other physical device identifiers. We already have > IMSI-based identifier, which is the IMSI-NAI; We needed similar identifier > based on MAC address for Wi-Fi, and also others identifiers based on some > other sources. So, this is more about extending the base 4283 work with new > types. > > > Regards > Sri > > > > > From: Hui Deng <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, October 17, 2014 7:14 PM > To: Sri Gundavelli <[email protected]> > Cc: "Charles E. Perkins" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" < > [email protected]> > Subject: Re: [DMM] Fwd: New Version Notification for > draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-00.txt > > how it is related to : > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-id-00.txt > > -Hui > > 2014-10-16 17:03 GMT+08:00 Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <[email protected]>: > >> Charlie – Are you asking the WG/chairs for draft adoption ? The >> current version can be a good starting point and can be taken up as the –00 >> version of the WG draft. Off course, you still have plenty of comments on >> additional types values that the draft still needs to address :), but the >> current version can be adopted as a WG draft, IMO. >> >> >> Sri >> >> >> >> >> >> From: "Charles E. Perkins" <[email protected]> >> Organization: Blue Skies >> Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 12:09 PM >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Subject: [DMM] Fwd: New Version Notification for >> draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-00.txt >> >> Hello folks, >> >> We have published a ...-00 version of the MNIDs draft. This is mainly for >> reference purposes. A new version should be out within a week or so, >> incorporating the suggestions and comments from people who responded >> to the earlier suggestion to revisit this work. >> >> Regards, >> Charlie P. >> >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: New Version Notification >> for draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-00.txt Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 10:43:12 >> -0700 From: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> To: >> Charles >> E. Perkins <[email protected]> <[email protected]>, Vijay >> Devarapalli <[email protected]> >> <[email protected]>, Charles E.Perkins >> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> >> A new version of I-D, draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-00.txt >> has been successfully submitted by Charles E. Perkins and posted to the >> IETF repository. >> >> Name: draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids >> Revision: 00 >> Title: MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283 Mobile Node Identifier >> Option >> Document date: 2014-09-23 >> Group: Individual Submission >> Pages: 4 >> URL: >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-00.txt >> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids/ >> Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-00 >> >> >> Abstract: >> Additional Identifier Types are proposed for use with the Mobile Node >> Identifier Option for MIPv6 (RFC 4283). >> >> >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> The IETF Secretariat >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmm mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >> >> >
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
