Hi Jong-Hyouk, On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Jong-Hyouk Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all > > I support the adoption of this draft as a WG draft even with the concerns > pointed by Mingui. This draft has a merit of the introduction of the generic > protocol extension allowing a multihomed MAG
No, the extension is for the RG, i.e. Residential Gateway which is a broadband or fixed network element. > to register more than one PCoA > to the LMA. It is definitely useful for a multihomed environment. Why would a MAG be multihomed? I am not aware of any proposals that e..g the serving gateway in 3GPP network where MAG is placed should be multihomed. Regards, Behcet > Authors > may update this draft to address Mingui’s comments if needed. > > J. > -- > Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random > Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University > > #email: [email protected] > #webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon > > On Nov 26, 2015, at 5:00 PM, Mingui Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I remember it was suggested to remove DSL, “Hybrid Access”, etc, and the > suggestion was acknowledged. We haven’t seen an updated version yet. It is > not ready to be adopted, I think. > > I have read the draft. I found the scope greatly shrinked from the 01 to 02. > I guess the draft wants to fight through by providing a more generic > protocol extension, while awaiting for real use cases. And, Hybrid Access > could be treated as a potential use case (Actually, the DSL+LTE scenario is > now intentionally inherited from the 00 version as a use case.). If I guess > right, I don’t think it’s a good starting point since it only covers a > fragment of a possible solution. Besides the care of addresses, there are > many other gaps that have not been touched: per-packet traffic > classification and recombination, performance measurement, the bypass > requirement, etc. From the draft, we cannot figure out a clear architectural > overview. Section 3 doesn’t help much. > > Hence, I oppose its adoption. > > Thanks, > Mingui > > From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dapeng Liu > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:22 AM > To: dmm > Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: > draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 > > Hello all, > > In IETF94, we initiated the call for adoption for the draft: > draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 > Seems have got sufficient support during the meeting. We'd like to confirm > the call for adoption in the mailing list for 2 weeks. > Please send your opinion and comments to the list before December 9. > > > Thanks, > ------ > Best Regards, > Dapeng&Jouni > > > > > > -- > > ------ > Best Regards, > Dapeng Liu > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
