One thing to add. LISP has a more mature control-plane mapping system. ILA has a recent proposal for its control-plane.
Dino > On Feb 1, 2018, at 3:33 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Thank you Dino. > > WG - Same comments for this draft. LISP is another LOC-ID proposal, with > many common attributes (if I may say, like two twins) shared with ILA; > some differences in how the Locator (COA) and identifier (HOA) spaces are > defined/used/managed, and with one key difference of tunneling vs > translation. Please review. > > > Regards > Sri > > On 2/1/18, 2:59 PM, "Dino Farinacci" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> ILA is one of the proposals on the table. This is not an adoption call >>> at >>> this time, but asking the WG to review and open up some discussions that >>> will help IETF understand the problem/solutions, and pick the right >>> solution(s) for this problem statement. If there is interest and if the >>> work is in scope for the group, we will issue an adoption call at some >>> point in future. Please review. >> >> I just got on the dmm list. Here is another proposal: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farinacci-lisp-mobile-network/ >> >> Dino >> > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
