Hi Dino, > -----Original Message----- > From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dino Farinacci > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2018 3:38 PM > To: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; dmm <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [DMM] [Ila] Fwd: New Version Notification for > draft-herbert-ila-mobile-00.txt > > One thing to add. LISP has a more mature control-plane mapping system. ILA > has a recent proposal for its control-plane.
AERO uses IPv6 Neighbor Discovery as its control-plane. Surely that is the most mature? Thanks - Fred > Dino > > > On Feb 1, 2018, at 3:33 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Thank you Dino. > > > > WG - Same comments for this draft. LISP is another LOC-ID proposal, with > > many common attributes (if I may say, like two twins) shared with ILA; > > some differences in how the Locator (COA) and identifier (HOA) spaces are > > defined/used/managed, and with one key difference of tunneling vs > > translation. Please review. > > > > > > Regards > > Sri > > > > On 2/1/18, 2:59 PM, "Dino Farinacci" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> ILA is one of the proposals on the table. This is not an adoption call > >>> at > >>> this time, but asking the WG to review and open up some discussions that > >>> will help IETF understand the problem/solutions, and pick the right > >>> solution(s) for this problem statement. If there is interest and if the > >>> work is in scope for the group, we will issue an adoption call at some > >>> point in future. Please review. > >> > >> I just got on the dmm list. Here is another proposal: > >> > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farinacci-lisp-mobile-network/ > >> > >> Dino > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
