Sure, but I assume the mapping table/DB is some where else in some central location and not on the UPF?
The question is how does the UPF fetch that entry and if the interface for that query is built on some 3GPP interface, or its internal to LISP with no bearing on the access technology. Sri On 2/5/18, 6:42 PM, "Dino Farinacci" <[email protected]> wrote: >I don’t know what you mean. If you put the xTR function on an UPF, then >by LISP spec definition, Map-Request, Map-Reply, and Map-Register >functionality is part of the UPF. > >Dino > >> On Feb 5, 2018, at 5:27 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) >><[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I suspect there might be a need for a new interface. >> >> Assuming the LISP mapping system stays in the control plane, next to >> SMF/AMF, and the xTR functions on the UPF, there needs to be probably a >> new interface along the lines of the N4, for managing the LISP MAP >> operations (Reg/Req/Reply/Notify..). But, off course if the mapping >> system stays in the user-plane, may be there is just interworking with >>the >> 3GPP authentication interfaces. >> >> Sri >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 2/5/18, 5:15 PM, "Bogineni, Kalyani" >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dino: >>> >>> Please look at 3GPP TS 23.501 to understand the architecture of NGC. We >>> tried to explain that in the White paper. >>> TS 23.502 has the procedures for the NGC. TS 23.503 specifies the >>>policy >>> and charging control framework for NGC. >>> CT4 has a technical report on protocol aspects for NGC in TR 29.891. >>> >>> Your draft needs to describe how it fits in the 5G architecture, right >>> now it only addresses 4G. >>> >>> Kalyani >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: ila [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dino Farinacci >>> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 7:32 PM >>> To: Bogineni, Kalyani <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Tom Herbert <[email protected]>; [email protected]; dmm <[email protected]>; >>> Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [Ila] [E] Re: [DMM] Fwd: New Version Notification for >>> draft-herbert-ila-mobile-00.txt >>> >>>> On Feb 6, 2018, at 5:04 AM, Bogineni, Kalyani >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dino: >>>> >>>> Can you add a section to show how this proposal would fit in 5G >>>> architecture? >>> >>> Can you be more specific in what you¹d like to see in the new section? >>> >>> There are references throughout the draft where you see eNodeB and pGW >>> that UPF functionality could be at the same network mode location. >>> >>> Dino >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ila mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> >>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailma >>>n_ >>> >>>listinfo_ila&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=Id >>>iS >>> >>>ODh8aDRjdCeGgd9MznLHMYKgKcs_YSwXBDiaofh47oilzaXYRYETcBynUdpT&m=zf1KfRu4n >>>UF >>> >>>sUT8IJVExPygA_iAC-h4BErkY_CE2ugM&s=oLQOKLOAxuYtjVD_qWMbiQjkmP9acy6Au0X6l >>>pS >>> iBvg&e= >> > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
