Le 07/02/2018 à 18:29, Tom Herbert a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Alexandre Petrescu
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Le 06/02/2018 à 05:52, Lorenzo Colitti a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 6:27 AM, Tom Herbert <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
We like like to request that the dmm WG consider ILA as a candidate
protocol for the 3GPP "Study on User Plane Protocol in 5GC".
Echoing Tom's earlier comment about this: I think the address
assignment sections (6.3 and 8.3) should be reworded to clarify that
for general purpose hosts, best practice is not to use singleton
addresses, but always to provide a /64 prefix.
I would say a prefix yes, but prefer a /63 and shorter.
Alex,
I'm curious as to why you'd need even shorter prefixes.
This is an optional accessory.
A /63 prefix is beneficial for a Mobile Router, or 'IoT Router', for
local area tethering, or for in-vehicle networks. It gets a /63 from
the ISP and makes two /64s out of it. One for its WiFi interface and
one for its Ethernet interface.
If it only gets a /64 then it cant make other /64s out of it and it
can't route.
Alex
If a subnet is
so huge that it needs more than a /64, why not just give it a static
prefix allocation. ILA can be used independently within the subnet
if desired.
Tom
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
