Response inline. -----Original Message----- From: ila [mailto:ila-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Satoru Matsushima Sent: Friday, February 9, 2018 3:53 AM To: Bogineni, Kalyani <kalyani.bogin...@verizonwireless.com> Cc: i...@ietf.org; dmm <dmm@ietf.org> Subject: [E] [Ila] Non-mobility functions in Uplane [was Re: review comments on ] draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-00.txt]
Kalyani, # Subject changed. > > Maybe you can see SRv6 mobile uplane as a set of SRv6 functions like a SRv6 > profile for mobile with some augment. > > When it comes to service function type UPF, you name it. Following draft > exhibits how service chain can be done by SRv6: > [KB] I think these are non-mobility functions as being discussed on the email > thread with Marco Liebsch. I saw that discussion. Non-mobility functions of which deployed on SGi/Gi-LAN types can still be considered as functions deployed in N6. IMO I couldn’t find that assumption in TS23.501. So it would be a clarification point whether those type of UP functions can be deployed within mobility management data path programmed by SMF utilizing (multiple) N9. Thought? [KB] My colleague in SA2 pointed me to section 5.8 in 23.501. Cheers, --satoru _______________________________________________ ila mailing list i...@ietf.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_ila&d=DwIGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=IdiSODh8aDRjdCeGgd9MznLHMYKgKcs_YSwXBDiaofh47oilzaXYRYETcBynUdpT&m=Lfncf6GKwV3VXzMDab1Zrt4pS5e7aPPp71q5GG4KJoA&s=-oaS94clL2rlhMkX3t5-vZnam6do2O_1QFL8qMP4u0g&e= _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
