On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 01:55:02AM +0000, Isaac Dunham wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 07:10:59PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:27:23 -0500 > > Hendrik Boom <hend...@topoi.pooq.com> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:57:29AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote: > > > > > > > > If you're talking about Devuan, yes, it is! I got on the Devuan > > > > mailing list just to escape systemd, and have been pleasantly > > > > surprised by how Devuan is re-architecting everything. > > > > > > Does that meerly reflect how systemd is dearchitecting everything? > > > Or are there things being rearchitected that aren't systemd issues? > > > > > > -- hendrik > > > > Well, first of all, understand the only Devuan I've run is Valentines, > > and I didn't peer too deeply under the hood. My opinions come from > > things the Devuan Developers say on this list. I've seen a replacement > > for udev which, if I'm not mistaken, can simply be substituted for udev > > or eudev. <snip> > > As far as I can tell, nothing's available *yet* that can *simply* > be substituted for (e)udev.
As I understand it, it's necessary to replace udev -- but is it necessary to replace eudev? -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
