On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:24:56 -0500 Hendrik Boom <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 01:55:02AM +0000, Isaac Dunham wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 07:10:59PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:27:23 -0500 > > > Hendrik Boom <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:57:29AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote: > > > > > > > > > > If you're talking about Devuan, yes, it is! I got on the > > > > > Devuan mailing list just to escape systemd, and have been > > > > > pleasantly surprised by how Devuan is re-architecting > > > > > everything. > > > > > > > > Does that meerly reflect how systemd is dearchitecting > > > > everything? Or are there things being rearchitected that aren't > > > > systemd issues? > > > > > > > > -- hendrik > > > > > > Well, first of all, understand the only Devuan I've run is > > > Valentines, and I didn't peer too deeply under the hood. My > > > opinions come from things the Devuan Developers say on this list. > > > I've seen a replacement for udev which, if I'm not mistaken, can > > > simply be substituted for udev or eudev. <snip> > > > > As far as I can tell, nothing's available *yet* that can *simply* > > be substituted for (e)udev. > > As I understand it, it's necessary to replace udev -- but is it > necessary to replace eudev? > > -- hendrik I understood that both vdev and eudev are aftermarket replacements for udev, and the three can bolt-in replace each other for the purposes of getting devices initialized, though only udev does us the "favor" of linking to systemd. SteveT Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
