On Thu, 2015-05-14 at 12:15 -0500, T.J. Duchene wrote: > > I think the fact that I pointed out clearly shows that there is very good > > technical reason to exclude udev, unless you are willing to be the > > maintainer > > of udev outside systemd source tree in Devuan. >
> The shortest and most reasonable route to release a stable 1.0 of > Devuan is to use udev for the present. See below. > Eudev might make a good > replacement, but udev is still the best candidate in terms of people > using it if you follow the principle that "eyes make bugs shallow". People are working _now_ on eudev as a replacement for udev until vdev is finished. It might even be a good replacement for udev already for the devuan jessie release. What do you do, except chat? > From my point of view, past > conversations here have been as "toxic" as Debian and the rest of Linux > in general. I think you are alone on this, sorry. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
