On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:15:50PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-05-14 at 12:15 -0500, T.J. Duchene wrote: > > > I think the fact that I pointed out clearly shows that there is very good > > > technical reason to exclude udev, unless you are willing to be the > > > maintainer > > > of udev outside systemd source tree in Devuan. > > > > > The shortest and most reasonable route to release a stable 1.0 of > > Devuan is to use udev for the present. > > See below. > > > Eudev might make a good > > replacement, but udev is still the best candidate in terms of people > > using it if you follow the principle that "eyes make bugs shallow". > > People are working _now_ on eudev as a replacement for udev until vdev > is finished. It might even be a good replacement for udev already for > the devuan jessie release. What do you do, except chat?
Isn't eudev actually the systemd-free fork of udev everyone is asking for? -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
