On 19/12/15 10:53, John Hughes wrote:
On 19/12/15 11:28, Rowland Penny wrote:
On 19/12/15 10:21, John Hughes wrote:
On 18/12/15 19:40, Steve Litt wrote:
most of [ JH's posts ] tended to say "libsystemd0 isn't that bad",
I don't think it's that bad, and, despite my asking nobody can tell
me why it is.
I will give you a good reason why systemd is bad, if you try to
remove it from debian, it also removes your desktop etc.
Are you talking about libsystemd0? Because it's not true that
removing systemd from Debian will remove your desktop. If you are
talking about libsystemd0 why do you want to remove it? All I see are
circular arguments -- "libsystemd0" is bad because removing it breaks
things, so we must remove it.
Look, you troll, If you 'apt-get remove systemd' on debian, it will
remove Gnome or Mate, I know I tried. Anything that does this, is *BAD*
in my books.
Will somebody please do what debian does when somebody says systemd is
bad on their mailing list -- Ban him!
Rowland
I decided to post to the list because it seems to me that you're all
fiddling around with cosmetic parts of the problem (remove
libsystemd0, replace udev and so on) while ignoring the huge
steaming elephant turd in the middle of the room -- logind.
Without a functional replacement for logind then Devuan is doomed.
Why?, Linux worked very well before 'logind' appeared.
Maybe, but it doesn't now, so either you stick to wheezy or you fix
the problem. Ignoring it won't make it go away.
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
